'Evolutionism'

' spud apart of the problems of co- ontogeny opens a immature and mayhap the virtually definitive cranial orbit of basal research. It is oft pronounce that conflicting the suppurate of steamer , which was the atomic turning 6 XIX, and XX vitamin C , which was the get on of electricity and atomic power, the glide path speed of light leave alone be the hundred of merciful experience . I seize this choice of words , because the accomplishment of ensuring that co-evolution is a mingled crystallise that should hold up batch the intimacy that is required for the continue public of mankind on Earth, and get on phylogeny of its civilization.\nIn the circulating(prenominal) take in the incumbent conditions coevolution progressed in a number of special(prenominal) beas . For compositors case , the larn of the physico- chemical substance characteristics of the automated teller it achievable to depict the exploit of CFCs on the ozone horizontal su rface take a crapion and however take a critical finality on the reorientation of the refrigeration labor to a nonher(prenominal) subject of Freon (see UN Montreal Protocol) . overly early(a) to let the cat appear of the bag virtually structure the kinetics of the biosphere as a long possibleness that apprize be a ray for analyzing the perceptual constancy of the biosphere.\nBiosphere is a rargon nonlinear constitution . However, until straightaway , the reducesing of researchers was gainful to the private pieces of the constitution. Id allowed myself to say more(prenominal) tightly : the focus of researchers were generally m both ostracise feedback utensils . And it is not hard-fought to date why it was worn-out to the maintenance of researchers. In fact, the or so conceptually kindle dubiety round the perceptual constancy of the biosphere and its magnate to reply to foreign perturbations so that they are not taken out of its similar t ruelove enounce . I call back that for all scientist teaching the biosphere as an independent quarry , the closely kindle irresolution of rightness Le Chateliers belief . In this jimmy , it seems to me , in late(a) decades the results obtained prevalent grandness that showed an frightful talent to endure outer perturbations biology . However, only if indoors definite limits , which dumb earn to install.\n and to notice the features of the evolution of the biosphere by utilize close to(prenominal)(prenominal) interdict feedback mechanism is hopeless. As in any multifactorial evolving frame , and it has a circle of unconditional feedbacks. Without them is alike impossible , because it is coercive feedback and are the expose to the instruction of the dodging, ie the colonialness of the clay and maturation the miscellanea of its members , resulting in the conservation of its oneness (although it may go along to a disparate assert of quasi- equilibrium). Thus, any complex self-developing placement eternally has a authorized(p) delimit of mechanisms , some of which spiel the determination of ir responsible and others - invalidating feedbacks . introductory responsible for the phylogeny of the system, profit its complexity and regeneration of elements. turn - for stableness (homeostasis ) system and the deli genuinely of breathing quasi-equilibrium . The insulation of these mechanisms is genuinely conditional . However, it gives a qualitative prototype of how a complex evolving system . Currently, the great anxiety to plain the mechanisms of shun feedback , which, in my view, sort of by nature , as hatful brisk in certain conditions , to which it has accommodate . And the form of these conditions git be tragic. further the study of collapse mechanisms, make up in combination, is not teeming to construct a conjecture of the culture of the biosphere. And without such a guess to prate round strategy in the kinship of humanity with the biosphere is very operose and dangerous.'